Debate Between the Needs of Homeland Security and Individual-Privacy Term Paper

Debate mingled with the Needs of Homeland Security and Individual-Privacy Expectations - Term Paper ExampleMore specifically, the paper will assure the arguments concerning how assumes of homeland protective cover conflict with individual screen expectations. Discussion concord to Haulley (2005), the devastating kinfolk 11, 2001 terrorist attacks significantly impacted on nations around the world. Following the attacks, the United States government made the safety of the ordinary and nations tribute a top priority. Consequently, the government passed legislation that allowed the police and security forces to suck up more surveillance powers. Linden (2007) asserts that this saw the introduction of new controls on the verification of identity and somatogenetic movements, which monitored movements along borders and airports. For instance, biometrics technology came into being the introduction of such technology has given rise to debates concerning the need to balance individu al liberties and protect the nation against threats from terrorists. As the department of homeland security works intemperately to ensure that it maintains security within the United States, it faces challenges in addressing discommodes of privacy. The department has not succeeded in ensuring that the show ups concerning privacy atomic number 18 addressed comprehensively and assessed when making programmatic changes (Sauter & Carafano, 2005). Federal agencies working under the department of homeland security birth engaged in data mining, which entails analyzing a lot of data to make known hidden relationships. The issue of data mining has faced uncertainty and controversy as it interferes with individual privacy. Department of homeland security does not assess the privacy risks posed by the tools hired in data mining (Rabkin, 2005). According to Rabkin (2005), with the inception of the department of homeland security, issues of national security and privacy have become core in the war against terror. Whenever privacy comes in during a debate for national security, issues of whether one should keep their discipline offstage and be safe from attacks dominate the debate. As such, antiterrorism has set up an unreasonable equation, where people have to lead between the need for security and keep their in the flesh(predicate) information private. Both issues can be regarded as crucial as the constitution protects against the interference with personal privacy. Therefore, the government should determine the value of privacy and how it ought to be protected. In its efforts to preserve national security, the department of homeland security should not undermine the rights of individuals to keep personal information private. Debates ensue over the privacy challenges, which the department of homeland security faces, especially in reassessing the risks of privacy when changes came into being in developing a prescreening program in airlines (Sauter & Carafano, 200 5). The computer-assisted system for prescreening of passengers, also known as Secure Flight, aims at assessing passengers before they board airlines in domestic flights. In such an instance, homeland security does not fully disclose how it will use private information. This is contrary to the privacy act of 1974, which states that the use of private information should be fully disclosed (Thaler, 2005). The Department of Homeland Security also faces the issue of making sure that considerations on privacy remain confidential in an environment where the sharing of information has become a norm. The enactment of the Intelligence